Saying Goodbye to Santa
Claus
Spoiler Alert: Santa’s
“Big Secret” revealed in this blog entry.
Exhibit One: Me with Santa Claus at home in the 1960s, proof
positive that he exists.
Now that Santa has flown in, tucked gifts under trees both
hither and yon, and headed back to the North Pole for some well-deserved
R&R, I feel it’s time to take a look at one of America’s biggest myths and
think about how it may have affected us as a nation…or not.
But first, in the spirit of the holiday season, I offer a
nostalgic visit to my hometown in Massachusetts circa 1970. Picture plastic
candles in each street-facing window and a lacquered pinecone wreath adorned
with a festive red felt bow on the front door. If you peer in through the
spray-on snow frosting the windows, you can see me carefully filling a plastic
garbage bag with dozens of gifts. My parents watch, slightly puzzled but mostly
silent, as I pull on my snow boots and mittens, then leave the house, bag slung
over my shoulder.
A week or so earlier, I had learned a shocking truth that
rocked my little world—a secret that had been kept by nearly every adult I had
ever met. They had lied to me, these adults. People whom I had trusted
entirely, including the local minister and my own parents, had taken part in an
international conspiracy and perpetrated a myth, a fantasy, a fiction. The
story included a conveniently distant setting, a saintly protagonist (whom I
had met in person on several occasions), and a desirable plotline that evoked
grand themes of peace, good will, and generosity. To cover their tracks, my
parents had even planted evidence: sleigh bells jangled as sound effects in the
wee hours of Christmas morning; cookie crumbs and half-drunk tumblers of milk
left on the metal TV table set up alongside the chimney.
All of this was an elaborate scheme that blurred the lines
between fiction and nonfiction, between fantasy and reality. Young and
gullible, I was easily duped. Of course there was a Santa. Of course reindeer
flew. Why even question the physics of how, in one single night, a rather
rotund man could pilot a craft to every single household around the world and
leave presents for all the good boys and girls—and still have time to toss back
some cookies and sip some milk in each abode?
In asking me to believe in such fantastic things, my parents
taught me an important lesson that would be vital to my budding literary
ambitions: how to suspend disbelief. In doing so, however, they taught a
corollary lesson: how to suspend belief. In other words, in order to suspend my
disbelief in Santa Claus, I also had to suspend my belief in many of the
lessons learned in grade school (science, geography, math, etc.).
In some ways, then, the revelation that Santa Claus was a
fabrication probably came as something of a relief to me. The dissonance
between fantasy and fact, between what I was being told to believe and what I
was learning to be true, lessened. That psychological summary may be a bit too
deep to ascribe to an eight-year-old’s consciousness, so let me state it
another way: Santa or no, the presents were still there on Christmas morning,
and so all was well with the world.
Luckily for me, my parents didn’t serve up the revelation
about Santa Claus with a simple “Sorry, kid, but that’s just the way it is.”
They discussed the importance of symbolism and how this extended to the Santa
myth, claiming that while Santa himself may not be real, the spirit of giving
that he represents lives on in the hearts and souls of all those who have heard
his story. Any fan of the famous “Yes, Virginia, There Is a Santa Claus”
newspaper editorial might have accused my parents of plagiarism, but I could
tell they were sincere.
Still: Such power in a fictional tale! Suddenly, my dreams
of becoming a fiction writer one day became a vastly more important, almost
religious endeavor. See how the power of a story, even a fictional story like
Santa Claus, could have such great positive effect on the real human world!
And so I headed off into the night with my makeshift Santa sack.
Inside I had placed carefully wrapped toys and books for the kids, and on the
second and third winters’ visits, some ribbon candy for the adults in each
household. I carried on the tradition until, one year, something unexpected
happened. Some families had wrapped and readied gifts and treats for me.
Somewhat embarrassed by their assumption that I expected something in return, I
ended the Christmas Eve tradition that same year.
For years, I forgot about this bit of personal history. I
was recently reminded of it by an article about a Vermont teacher accused of
being unprofessional and irresponsible for spilling the beans about Santa in a
fifth-grade classroom. The teacher had asked students to list names of famous
people in American history. In order to keep the lesson focused on facts, the
teacher felt compelled to leave figures such as Winnie the Pooh, Harry Potter,
and Santa Claus off the list. (I could not tell from the article if she allowed
the also-mentioned Jeff Foxworthy and Justin Bieber to remain on the list, but
that’s another discussion for another time.)
(The full article is here:
The mother who raised the “unprofessional” and
“irresponsible” charges against the teacher went on to say that teaching about
Santa Claus was like teaching about religion: the topic is best set aside with
recommendations to ask one’s parents about such things. That seems fair
enough…until I thought about the goals of education in general.
Since a good part of my day job (writing and editing
educational materials) relies on the various state standards developed by
school boards (many of them quite conservative) around the country, I know that
“learning to distinguish between fantasy and reality” is a pretty important
benchmark in the lower grades. (Keep in mind that the instance noted above took
place in a fifth-grade classroom.) In
other words, children are required to differentiate between nonfiction and
fiction (fairy tales, myths, legends, and the like). Teachers are required to
provide students with the skills and strategies to do this. By fifth grade,
then, your average American student should have the reasoning skills to figure
out the Santa thing on her/his own. Any parent who disagrees risks spotlighting
their children as slow learners—perhaps along with themselves.
According to research done by psychiatrists at Ithaca
College and Cornell University in the 1990s, the average American child learns
the truth about Santa at age 7 1/2. However, after interviewing 500
elementary-school children, they discovered that “Many children kept up the
charade after they knew the truth…because they did not want to disappoint their
parents.”
Parents, take a moment to reflect one the meaning of
that last clause (no pun intended). Your kids may be duping you into believing
that they still believe in Santa. I think back on my own behavior as a
pseudo-Santa and wonder if that was, in some warped way, an effort to turn the
lies my parents had told me into truths…ergo, my parents had not lied to me
after all.
Further, Dr. John Condry, one of the authors of the
Ithaca/Cornell study, reported, “Not a single child told us they were unhappy
or upset by their parents having lied about Santa Claus. The most common
response to finding out the truth was that they felt older and more mature.
They now knew something that the younger kids didn't.”
(You can read more about the study here:
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/21/garden/parent-child.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm)
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/21/garden/parent-child.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm)
This finding surprised me. “Not a single child”?
Parents, take another moment to think about telling your child that he or she
cannot have a toy or candy bar that he or she has already selected while you
were shopping at the grocery store. When you took the item away, was your child
calm and well-mannered about it? Or was the response similar to those submitted
for a recent Jimmy Kimmel spot in which the talk show host asked parents to
tell their children, “Hey, sorry, I ate all your Halloween candy.” (Permissions
permitting, the videotaped results of this rather non-academic study are here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/03/jimmy-kimmels-ate-halloween-candy-challenge_n_1074334.html)
In a 2006 opinion piece in the New York Times, Jaqueline Woolley wrote, “Children do a great job
of scientifically evaluating Santa. And adults do a great job of duping them.
As we gradually withdraw our support for the myth, and children piece together
the truth, their view of Santa aligns with ours. Perhaps it is this kinship
with the adult world that prevents children from feeling anger over having been
misled.” What is this “kinship with the adult world” of which Woolley writes?
Is it the tacit understanding that adults lie, and that it is OK for them to
lie (or “support a myth”) on a grand scale?
(The link to the Woolley article is here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/23/opinion/23woolley.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/23/opinion/23woolley.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)
Surely someone sees this Santa thing differently. For
balance, I turned to a group whose opposition to myths and distortions is part
and parcel of their identity: the objectivists. This group is huge these days
with Republicans and the Tea Party, both of which have renewed a fervent
interest in the writings of Ayn Rand, particularly as it applies to
self-determination and self-interest. Surely, the somewhat socialist “give
liberally to the poor children of the world” Santa myth (I base that
description on the story’s historical roots in relation to Saint Nicholas, who,
by the way, was also the patron saint of pawnbrokers) would be anathema to such
a group. And it is.
According to Andrew Bernstein, a senior writer of the
Ayn Rand Institute, “"Santa Claus is, in literal terms, the anti-Christ.
He is about joy, justice, and material gain, not suffering, forgiveness, and
denial.” Another quote from the article: "The commercialism of Christmas,
its emphasis on ingenuity, pleasure, and gift buying, is the holiday's best
aspect—because it is a celebration, the achievement of life."
(You can read the full piece, a celebration of the
commercialism of Christmas, here:
http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=1263&page=NewsArticle&id=7632)
http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=1263&page=NewsArticle&id=7632)
All of this leaves me as puzzled about Santa Claus as I was
when I learned the dark secret of his nonexistence. To this day, I give presents
that have “From Santa” scrawled on the tag, and I try to mask my own
handwriting despite the fact that the recipients know they’re from me.
Likewise, I love surprise presents: gifts that appear out of the blue from
anonymous sources, those random acts of kindness that rekindle our faith in
human generosity. (Special kudos to Ben and Jerry’s for a coupon they once
published that granted a free ice cream cone to the person in line behind you at one of their scoop shops.
Brilliant.)
The spirit of Santa lives on and is no lie. It survives
despite the increases in greed and entitlement—both running rampant through our
society today, malignant cancers that question and threaten human compassion
and generosity. I’d even argue that the spirit of Santa, despite its
secularization over the decades, also maintains its ties to the spirits of
nearly every religion, even those that claim independence from mythology or
dogma.
In the years ahead, perhaps we can pull that spirit back
from fiction and establish it fully as year-round fact. After all, nearly every
child longs for Santa to be more than a seasonal fantasy. Maybe it is up to the
child within us adults to make it so.
Postscript: I dedicate
this blog entry to my father (pictured above as Santa) who passed away in 2011
and was very dearly missed this Christmas season. His many gifts to me continue
to resonate throughout my life.

You've given me a lot to think about--especially as I wrestle with the feeling that my daughter is probably onto the whole Santa charade, but keeps it up for the sake of Robert, who still, clearly, believes. Part of what goes on in our house is the elevation of the myth and the story to a suspension, not just of disbelief, but a suspension of the world-as-it-is for a just a day or two--a suspension that elevates and sustains a sense of joy.
ReplyDelete